<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sandra Bullock and the Royal Stars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mountainastrologer.com/tma/sandra-bullock-and-the-royal-stars/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mountainastrologer.com/tma/sandra-bullock-and-the-royal-stars</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:37:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Plumb</title>
		<link>http://mountainastrologer.com/tma/sandra-bullock-and-the-royal-stars/comment-page-1#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Plumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountainastrologer.com/tma/?p=1255#comment-932</guid>
		<description>Hi there, I agree that Pelosi&#039;s Saturn Pluto square is most interesting..

I mentioned it last week, but no one else commented on it, so thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I agree that Pelosi&#8217;s Saturn Pluto square is most interesting..</p>
<p>I mentioned it last week, but no one else commented on it, so thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo Smerillo</title>
		<link>http://mountainastrologer.com/tma/sandra-bullock-and-the-royal-stars/comment-page-1#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo Smerillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mountainastrologer.com/tma/?p=1255#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Pelosi&#039;s SA-90-PL is all the more interesting as it has been been manifestly transited by the recent MA retrograde direct station. It is also = the SO 0.46 AQ and ME 0.40AQ [which are in 22.30 aspect to NE at 23.05 AQ = UR/MC] of Obama Inauguration and, of course, the UR 1.00 LE of the USA national chart, 30 Apr 1789, which in itself is = SO/NE = MA/PL = VE/UR and thus in 22.30, or H16 aspect pattern, to the MC of the USA at 22.44 TA.

Quite a show on the mere surface of things!
Which to my mind describes the actual events in a very cogent fashion. 

Sandra Bullock? Who?

feliciter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelosi&#8217;s SA-90-PL is all the more interesting as it has been been manifestly transited by the recent MA retrograde direct station. It is also = the SO 0.46 AQ and ME 0.40AQ [which are in 22.30 aspect to NE at 23.05 AQ = UR/MC] of Obama Inauguration and, of course, the UR 1.00 LE of the USA national chart, 30 Apr 1789, which in itself is = SO/NE = MA/PL = VE/UR and thus in 22.30, or H16 aspect pattern, to the MC of the USA at 22.44 TA.</p>
<p>Quite a show on the mere surface of things!<br />
Which to my mind describes the actual events in a very cogent fashion. </p>
<p>Sandra Bullock? Who?</p>
<p>feliciter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

